Skip to main content

How can we know God?

I am concerned with personal knowledge of God. It is a kind of knowledge that is based on acquaintance. In a sense, acquaintance knowledge generally has perceptual element. However, God, as invisible, is not perceptually accessible. So, if the invisible God, who exists, tries to reveal himself, either we do not understand what he tries to reveal or there is a way to somehow understand what he tries to reveal. Of course, it is possible that there is a God who tries to reveal himself and we do not understand what he tries to reveal. If such possibility is in actuality the case, then reflections on God are pretty much useless. It means that this God is unaware of the fact that he is doomed to fail in his attempts to reveal.

Christianity is a religion that assumes that the invisible God tries to reveal himself and there is a way to somehow understand what he tries to reveal. Although God is invisible, God’s revelatory acts in human history are visible. So, his revelatory acts in human history are perceptually accessible. If personal knowledge of God is based on acquaintance and acquaintance knowledge generally has perceptual element, then acquaintance with God’s revelatory acts in human history is the key in the development of our personal knowledge of God who tries to reveal himself. From a Christian standpoint, God’s major revelatory acts are captured by the history of Israel, the life and teachings of Jesus, and the works of the Holy Spirit through the ministries of the church. Whether we like it or not, there’s something spooky about the history of Israel. As a small nation, it continues to have contemporary relevance in world politics (not just in the study of world religions). The vastness of the scope of the influence of Jesus and Christianity in human history is astonishing. If there is a God who tries to reveal himself, it is somehow plausible to believe that the Christian religion is on the right track in assuming that such aspects of human history capture God’s major revelatory acts. From a Christian standpoint, personal knowledge of God must involve an acquaintance with his major revelatory acts in human history, which are primarily preserved in the Bible.

In addition, a personal knowledge of God involves the dialectic between divine leadership and human obedience. Major biblical figures (like Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jacob, Joseph, Jesus, Paul, and others) develop a personal knowledge of God through their acts of obedience in response to what they considered in faith to be God’s leading in their lives. Somehow, in the ongoing process of discerning (by faith) the leading of God in our lives and acting (by faith) in obedience to God’s leading, a personal knowledge of God emerges or develops. It is a kind of personal knowledge that gives rise to a deeper commitment to God and to the vision of his kingdom.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Lane Craig

Dr. William Lane Craig, a leading evangelical apologist, is featured in a major article in The Chronicle of Higher Education [see http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en ]. That should be a surprise, since CHE is not known for having a taste for people like Craig. I think that Craig is overrated by evangelicals, but underrated by academics. His triumphalism, I think, weakens the merits of his arguments, since it underrates what I consider to be persuasive cases for atheism. It tends to caricature his opponents’ arguments as unworthy of serious considerations. However, his skills as a debater are unparalleled. He is definitely a force to be reckoned with. Of course, winning a debate is not a sufficient condition for establishing the truth of one’s claim. But I think that his opponents, like Alexander Rosenberg (Duke philosopher) and Lawrence Krauss (theoretical physicist), are mistaken for downplaying the role of formal debates in ...
2 comments
Read more

Health Care Reform Bill and the Town Hall Meetings

I am annoyed by the recent town hall meetings with some U.S. senators and representatives. With angry citizens who are clearly misinformed by the conservative media and conservative politicians, rational discourses regarding Obama’s health care reform bill seem impossible. How can one have a rational discourse with anyone who is overwhelmed by his or her irrational impulses, in addition to deeply held false beliefs? They are misinformed considering that their claims are drawn from fallacious inferences (e.g. slippery slope, red herring, straw man, ad hominem, etc.). They are moved by their fears, prejudices, paranoia, insecurities, false assumptions, etc. Of course, conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative politicians (like Sarah Palin) are responsible for fanning the flame with fallacious, sensationalist, exaggerated, and caricatured claims about the proposed health care reform bill. Loud mouths with messages lacking in substance usually work in inspiring the masses. Substa...
1 comment
Read more

Politicization of the Pulpit

After the death of Jerry Falwell and the declining popularity of Pat Robertson, surprisingly the legacy of the evangelical right persists in politically conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative evangelical churches (like some Southern Baptist and Assemblies of God churches). Equipped with sensationalistic jesters and political preachers, bearers of such legacy can pester the current administration. No wonder Obama and his advisers are launching an attack on Fox News, the main source of information for the evangelical right. Since the presidential campaign season for the 2008 election, I heard numerous anti-Obama sermons in a large congregation with a devoutly Republican pastor. A devoutly Republican pastor is one who cleverly subsumes the Christian message under the Republican agendas. Many conservative evangelical churches have devoutly Republican pastors, who regularly politicize the pulpit by unnecessarily turning congregants against Obama. In a subtle way, this is danger...
2 comments
Read more