Skip to main content

Resurging Rudolf Carnap

One of the most underappreciated 20th century philosophers is Rudolf Carnap. I’ve always been fascinated and very much influenced by his works (especially “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”), although they have been overshadowed by the works of Wittgenstein and Quine, and his philosophical project has been described as a failure. I am just excited about David Chalmer’s new book, entitled Constructing the World, that attempts to bring to light and, at the same time, develop the valuable philosophical insights in Carnap’s Aufbau. I just hope that, with Michael Friedman’s Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Chalmer’s book will trigger a significant resurgence of interest in the works of Carnap. I think that Carnap deserves deep appreciation from the philosophical community.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nazarenes and Evolution

I am not a Nazarene, but I received my undergraduate degree from a Nazarene college. There's something admirable about how the Nazarene Church as a denomination is responding to the theory of evolution. It should serve as a model for other evangelical denominations. http://www.exploringevolution.com/
Post a Comment
Read more

Affordable Care Act

For clear and concise analyses and evaluations of the issue pertaining to the constitutionality of the "Affordable Care Act," see Jeffrey Toobin's comment: http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2012/07/09/120709taco_talk_toobin
Post a Comment
Read more

Creation vs. Evolution

While I was driving yesterday, I ended up listening to a Christian radio station. The hosts with a special guest pointed out how creationist students are persecuted by evolutionist professors. The special guest who was a former student in a secular university exaggeratedly related a story about a biology professor who would not write a recommendation letter for a student who did not affirm the truth of the theory of evolution. While I was listening, it dawned on me what exactly is the problem with the perspectives of fundamentalist creationists and dogmatic evolutionists. It appears to me that both of them are confused about the nature of a theory (especially a scientific one). I usually hear creationists claiming that the theory of evolution is a mere philosophical theory. So, they claim that it is not intellectually superior to creationism. On the other hand, evolutionists usually claim that the theory of evolution is actually a scientific theory, while creationism is a mere religiou...
Post a Comment
Read more