For a response to some aspects of Alvin Plantinga’s view on the relationship between science and Christian theism, see Hans Halvorson’s “Plantinga on Providence and Physics” [http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/9491/1/plantinga.pdf]. Halvorson, a respected philosopher of science from Princeton University, is qualified to evaluate Plantinga’s claims about such relationship. It appears to me that, like Plantinga, Halvorson is a Reformed Christian.
Dr. William Lane Craig, a leading evangelical apologist, is featured in a major article in The Chronicle of Higher Education [see http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en ]. That should be a surprise, since CHE is not known for having a taste for people like Craig. I think that Craig is overrated by evangelicals, but underrated by academics. His triumphalism, I think, weakens the merits of his arguments, since it underrates what I consider to be persuasive cases for atheism. It tends to caricature his opponents’ arguments as unworthy of serious considerations. However, his skills as a debater are unparalleled. He is definitely a force to be reckoned with. Of course, winning a debate is not a sufficient condition for establishing the truth of one’s claim. But I think that his opponents, like Alexander Rosenberg (Duke philosopher) and Lawrence Krauss (theoretical physicist), are mistaken for downplaying the role of formal debates in ...
Comments