Skip to main content

Marilyn McCord Adams on the Mission of a Christian Philosopher


"Being a Christian philosopher is a distinctive kind of missionary work. The proximate goal is not the personal conversion of die-hard secularists for whom belief in God is not a live option. It is rather to expose and dislodge anti-religious prejudice and to foster understanding. Understanding philosophical problems involves appreciating the costs and benefits of alternative solutions. The theoretical map is not complete without Christian options. The role of the Christian philosopher is to develop Christian approaches in, say, ethics and metaphysics and philosophy of mind with such rigor and detail as to exhibit their coherence, explanatory power, and fruitfulness. The aim is to show that Christian theories are strong enough to be viable competitors in the theoretical market-place. Such work is a form of service to the Truth, and for that very reason is good for professional philosophy"

 Source: http://www.epsociety.org/userfiles/art-AdamsM%20(Christian%20Philosophy)_Edited.pdf

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Politicization of the Pulpit

After the death of Jerry Falwell and the declining popularity of Pat Robertson, surprisingly the legacy of the evangelical right persists in politically conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative evangelical churches (like some Southern Baptist and Assemblies of God churches). Equipped with sensationalistic jesters and political preachers, bearers of such legacy can pester the current administration. No wonder Obama and his advisers are launching an attack on Fox News, the main source of information for the evangelical right. Since the presidential campaign season for the 2008 election, I heard numerous anti-Obama sermons in a large congregation with a devoutly Republican pastor. A devoutly Republican pastor is one who cleverly subsumes the Christian message under the Republican agendas. Many conservative evangelical churches have devoutly Republican pastors, who regularly politicize the pulpit by unnecessarily turning congregants against Obama. In a subtle way, this is danger...
2 comments
Read more

Illegalization of Abortion

Here’s my argument for why I think that the illegalization of abortion is philosophically problematic: (P1) x is a human just in case x has a genetic code that is distinctively human. (P2) A fetus, at some point in the fetal development, acquires a genetic code that is distinctively human. (P3) So, at a certain point in the fetal development, a fetus becomes a bona fide human. (P4) From a legal standpoint, the right to life of a human is protected by the law. (P5) There is no characterization of a human that can objectively identify its instantiations other than the mere possession of a distinctively human genetic code. (P6) So, a fetus, at a certain point in the fetal development, has the right to life that is protected by the law. (P7) However, Judith Jarvis Thomson presents an argument that persuasively proves that the fact that the fetus has the right to life does not necessarily entail that it has the right to use the mother’s body. (C) Therefore, even if a fetus has the right to ...
Post a Comment
Read more