Skip to main content

Religulous

I am not a fan of Bill Maher. As a matter of fact, I find him to be annoying. His obnoxiousness does not appeal to me. But I watched Maher’s “Religulous.” Essentially, it is a documentary that pokes fun at the credulity of religious people and the ridiculousness of religious claims (Christianity in particular). Although I am a Christian, I surprisingly like “Religulous.” It appears sacrilegious or blasphemous for a Christian to watch it. But I think that Christians should watch it.

Rottenness is sometimes not readily visible. It infects the inner core and gradually sets the process of decay. Sometimes the truth about a certain condition becomes more visible, when someone uninhibitedly brings out in the open the rottenness of what many consider to be sacred. So, there has to be a playing field, where nothing is sacred. In that playing field, we discover even that which is initially unimaginable. In a playing field where freethinking is suppressed in order to protect the sacred, the mind becomes oppressed by imprisonment to the uncorrected thinking of the past. A thing that is branded as sacred is usually immune from all-out criticisms. Such immunity hinders the discovery of any truth that can be accessible to humans, which can include the falsities of beliefs that we cherish as sacred. Maher’s uncensored mockeries of religion can bring to light the ridiculousness of our illusions and delusions. They are comedic corrections to our tragic doxastic dispositions.

Popular Christianity in its inner core is arguably rotten. Popular Christianity is corrupted by the ambitions of power-hungry clerics, scandalous behaviors of sexual maniacs in religious garbs, and money-making acts of religious pimps. Popular Christianity today is different from what Jesus and the apostles envisioned two thousand years ago. It looks shallow, dumb, ignorant, irrelevant, corrupt, hypocritical, narrow-minded, dogmatic, etc. “Religulous” reveals the current perception of Christianity among its cultured despisers. Christians should figure out what they can humbly learn from Maher’s insulting claims about Christianity, in order for them to learn how they should then live in the 21st century.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

William Lane Craig

Dr. William Lane Craig, a leading evangelical apologist, is featured in a major article in The Chronicle of Higher Education [see http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en ]. That should be a surprise, since CHE is not known for having a taste for people like Craig. I think that Craig is overrated by evangelicals, but underrated by academics. His triumphalism, I think, weakens the merits of his arguments, since it underrates what I consider to be persuasive cases for atheism. It tends to caricature his opponents’ arguments as unworthy of serious considerations. However, his skills as a debater are unparalleled. He is definitely a force to be reckoned with. Of course, winning a debate is not a sufficient condition for establishing the truth of one’s claim. But I think that his opponents, like Alexander Rosenberg (Duke philosopher) and Lawrence Krauss (theoretical physicist), are mistaken for downplaying the role of formal debates in

Politicization of the Pulpit

After the death of Jerry Falwell and the declining popularity of Pat Robertson, surprisingly the legacy of the evangelical right persists in politically conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative evangelical churches (like some Southern Baptist and Assemblies of God churches). Equipped with sensationalistic jesters and political preachers, bearers of such legacy can pester the current administration. No wonder Obama and his advisers are launching an attack on Fox News, the main source of information for the evangelical right. Since the presidential campaign season for the 2008 election, I heard numerous anti-Obama sermons in a large congregation with a devoutly Republican pastor. A devoutly Republican pastor is one who cleverly subsumes the Christian message under the Republican agendas. Many conservative evangelical churches have devoutly Republican pastors, who regularly politicize the pulpit by unnecessarily turning congregants against Obama. In a subtle way, this is danger