Skip to main content

Lawrence Krauss (Physicist) on Philosophy

Some scientists have an anti-philosophy bias. Lawrence Krauss, a famous physicist from Arizona State University, is definitely one of them. Krauss wrote a popular science book on cosmology, where he attempted to answer an old philosophical question: “Can something come from nothing?” David Albert, a philosopher from Columbia University who has a doctoral degree in physics, gave a deeply penetrating critique of Krauss’ book. In the process of answering the interview questions from The Atlantic regarding Albert’s review of his book, Krauss appears to have downplayed the value or significance of philosophy (including philosophy of science). The discussions that develop from the intellectual dispute between Krauss and Albert gave rise to very interesting insights on the value or significance of philosophy and the nature of the relationship between science and philosophy.
In order to learn more about it, one can start by looking at Brian Leiter’s blog:
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2012/04/lawrencekrauss.html
You need to follow the links on Leiter’s blog, in order to follow the story behind it and the significant responses of other scientists, philosophers, and informed bloggers to the dispute.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

William Lane Craig

Dr. William Lane Craig, a leading evangelical apologist, is featured in a major article in The Chronicle of Higher Education [see http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Theist/140019/?cid=cr&utm_source=cr&utm_medium=en ]. That should be a surprise, since CHE is not known for having a taste for people like Craig. I think that Craig is overrated by evangelicals, but underrated by academics. His triumphalism, I think, weakens the merits of his arguments, since it underrates what I consider to be persuasive cases for atheism. It tends to caricature his opponents’ arguments as unworthy of serious considerations. However, his skills as a debater are unparalleled. He is definitely a force to be reckoned with. Of course, winning a debate is not a sufficient condition for establishing the truth of one’s claim. But I think that his opponents, like Alexander Rosenberg (Duke philosopher) and Lawrence Krauss (theoretical physicist), are mistaken for downplaying the role of formal debates in
2 comments
Read more

Politicization of the Pulpit

After the death of Jerry Falwell and the declining popularity of Pat Robertson, surprisingly the legacy of the evangelical right persists in politically conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative evangelical churches (like some Southern Baptist and Assemblies of God churches). Equipped with sensationalistic jesters and political preachers, bearers of such legacy can pester the current administration. No wonder Obama and his advisers are launching an attack on Fox News, the main source of information for the evangelical right. Since the presidential campaign season for the 2008 election, I heard numerous anti-Obama sermons in a large congregation with a devoutly Republican pastor. A devoutly Republican pastor is one who cleverly subsumes the Christian message under the Republican agendas. Many conservative evangelical churches have devoutly Republican pastors, who regularly politicize the pulpit by unnecessarily turning congregants against Obama. In a subtle way, this is danger
2 comments
Read more

Health Care Reform Bill and the Town Hall Meetings

I am annoyed by the recent town hall meetings with some U.S. senators and representatives. With angry citizens who are clearly misinformed by the conservative media and conservative politicians, rational discourses regarding Obama’s health care reform bill seem impossible. How can one have a rational discourse with anyone who is overwhelmed by his or her irrational impulses, in addition to deeply held false beliefs? They are misinformed considering that their claims are drawn from fallacious inferences (e.g. slippery slope, red herring, straw man, ad hominem, etc.). They are moved by their fears, prejudices, paranoia, insecurities, false assumptions, etc. Of course, conservative media (like Fox News) and conservative politicians (like Sarah Palin) are responsible for fanning the flame with fallacious, sensationalist, exaggerated, and caricatured claims about the proposed health care reform bill. Loud mouths with messages lacking in substance usually work in inspiring the masses. Substa
1 comment
Read more